According
to the Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance Survey, nearly half of adolescents have
had vaginal intercourse, and 38.5% of those sexually active do not use condoms
and only 16% use a birth control pill.
The survey also shows that students are likely to have had sex before age
13, have four or more sexual partners, and to have never been taught about
sexually transmitted diseases in school. Mental health professionals are also
seeing an increase in the number of preteens having sex too soon. They also
reported that some of the preteens who are considering themselves virgins have
had oral sex 50 or 60 times. Adolescents are also turning to electronics by
sending sexual messages and pictures via text or email to express their sexuality.
A question from a reader asked
about sex education in the school system. She asked what the research said
about educating teens about sex education and if the schools should teach sex
education or abstinence only programs. Sex education has been an ongoing debate
for many years. Abstinence only programs are a federally funded program which began
in 1981 when the federal government funded the programs despite overwhelming research
proving they are ineffective. Funding for these unproven programs grew
exponentially from 1996 until 2009 when Congress allocated over one and a half
billion dollars into abstinence only programs. Despite all of the money that has went to
promote abstinence-until-marriage programs, research shows that these programs do
not reduce the incidence of unprotected vaginal sex, number of partners, or
sexual initiation.
There are three types of programs that
are taught in various schools in the country. The first is a curriculum-based
sexuality program. This program was developed to reduce adolescent sexual
activity, pregnancy, and STDs. These programs also offer positive information about
condoms and other contraceptives. The second program is abstinence only, which
focuses on the importance of abstinence from sexual intercourse, typically
until marriage. The abstinence only programs either do not discuss
contraception or they emphasize the limitations of condoms and contraceptives
in protecting against pregnancy and STDs. Research shows that abstinence only
education may delay intercourse for a short time, however, when the youth does
participate in sexual behaviors. The third program is a comprehensive program
which encourages both abstinence and the use of condoms and/or contraceptives.
Comprehensive programs have a very clear message that not having sex is the
safest choice. They put emphasis on skill-building and role-playing, they teach
how to use condoms, and they encourage people not to have sex. These programs
have been shown to delay the age at which teens first have sex, reduce the
number of sexual partners they have, and increase their use of condoms. The
comprehensive programs have no evidence of resulting in an increase in sexual
activity.
It is important that school and
parents work together to teach adolescents about sex. Although it is difficult for
a parent to think about their own children wanting to have sex, it is important
that parents talk to their children about sex. Because talking to teens about
sex can be embarrassing for the parent and/or the teen, it is good to practice
in front of a mirror or with your partner to get comfortable talking about it. Parents’
goal when talking to their children about sex should be to give information to
them and not to extract information from them. Even if kids act like they don’t
care or act like they are not listening, they probably are, so continue to talk
to kids about it.
-Tiffany
References:
Jayson, S. (2011). “Talk sex, even if your kids tune you
out.” USA Today.
Lickona, T. (2000). “Bringing parents into the picture.” Education Leadership.
Malone, P. (2010). “Comprehensive sex education vs. abstinence only until marriage programs.”
Realini, J. (2010). “Evaluations of Big Decisions.” Journal of Sex & Martial Therapy.
Lickona, T. (2000). “Bringing parents into the picture.” Education Leadership.
Malone, P. (2010). “Comprehensive sex education vs. abstinence only until marriage programs.”
Realini, J. (2010). “Evaluations of Big Decisions.” Journal of Sex & Martial Therapy.
4 comments:
I think it is interesting how big this has become recently. It is important to emphasize that comprehensive programs have no evidence in increasing sexual activity. I would much rather have my children learn about sex from a teacher or parent than from a friend or by making a big mistake.
I really like you information on the sex education. Also your advice about giving the information rather then trying to get them to spill to you. I am for sure going to apply that advice. Thank you,
Crystal
With how easily accessible sexual content has become, I feel that this post is highly informative and necessary.
A major role parents play is in teaching their children about sex. A parent who is involved in their teens life and regularly checks in, decreases the chance of their teen engaging in early sexual activity and drugs. As children enter adolescence, their social networks expand.
Everyday, they go through daily difficulties that can have a positive or negative impact on them. If a parent fails to recognize the cues, there is a serious problem.
Sex education has become a huge controversy. I believe it is very important that sex education is taught in schools. Kids start learning things at a younger age and often times its from their classmates. It is important for children to receive sex education. I think the abstinence only programs are doing more harm than good. Any good tips on how to approach sex education when talking to your kids??
-Liz T
Post a Comment